Listening log Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Listening log - Essay Example Rhythmically the song is more peaceful as featured by the lengthier duration of sound and also silence thereby commenting on the slow nature. When he sings â€Å"Cant play the blues cause of you I drop the beat† the song takes one away because of the perpetuating sound. The song has a homophonic texture as it is characterized by the harmony of chords taking similar rhythm. The simple accompaniment of the melody also suggests the homophonic nature. The thin and strained timbre used also allows the singer to pass his message to the lover. The instruments used provide several tones to create the chord for the song thereby giving harmony tones. This helps in supporting the quality of the music and depicts the blues nature of the song. For the form, there are total of six verses with no refrain. The form of each verse is the same, starting high and ending low, which essentially supports the peaceful rhythm of the song (Duckworth, 46). The folk rock song talks about the essentiality of love when everything else disappears. it is tailored by the six elements of music to ensure that it is enthralling to the expected audiences. One of the notable elements is melody especially at the refrain â€Å"Dont you want somebody to love?† whereby the tones used are far from each other, a suggestion of calm melody. The exciting melody helps in building the rhythm of the song as can be figured by the longer durations of sound as compared to that of silence. This supports the slowness of the song because of the uniformity brought about by the rhythm. For the harmony, the tones drop one at a time leading to creation of counter melody with no definite chord as can be depicted in the refrain. In this case, the counter melody helps in depicting the second voice as can be heard from the song. This also creates the form for the song whereby there is creation of tonal inversion at the refrain verse. The second

Should the Sex Offender Registry be abolished Research Paper

Should the Sex Offender Registry be abolished - Research Paper Example This paper argues for the abolishment of the public sex offender registry by giving concrete reasons against having the practice retained. Reasons why the Public Sex Offender Registry should be abolished Harm to families. Proponents of the public sex offender registry argue that making sex offender information public reduces the rates of sexual offenses by repeat offenders and enable parents to protect their children (IDEA, 2009). However, public notification of sex offenders does not only affect the offenders, but their families as well. This is because despite the fact that states have the discretion to decide on the criteria for disclosing sex offender information, majority of the states implements them to the extreme. Sex offenders get imprisonment sentences and remain incarcerated for a significant amount of time, but their families get to suffer more humiliation, especially when details get disclosed to the entire public, such as being made available on the internet. Hodgson an d Kelley point out that â€Å"highly publicized case have demonstrated a severe and negative impact on the victim’s family and the offender’s family† (2002, p. 229). Cases of mistaken identities after release of offender information to the public have also been witnessed, and the persons incorrectly identified as sex offenders have undergone harassment and assault. Ex-offenders and their families suffer constant instability when their private information such as name, age, place of employment, address, and crime committed is made available to the public. This includes lack of proper employment and challenges accessing suitable housing.... This paper stresses that proponents of the public sex offender registry argue that making sex offender information public reduces the rates of sexual offenses by repeat offenders and enable parents to protect their children. However, public notification of sex offenders does not only affect the offenders, but their families as well. This is because despite the fact that states have the discretion to decide on the criteria for disclosing sex offender information, majority of the states implements them to the extreme. Sex offenders get imprisonment sentences and remain incarcerated for a significant amount of time, but their families get to suffer more humiliation, especially when details get disclosed to the entire public, such as being made available on the internet. The author talks that supporters of the preservation of the public sex offender registry and relevant acts argue that the registration is important in protecting them and their children. They however forget the tax burde n imposed on tax payers, who have to pay the salaries and fund all operations of the staff working in these units. The implementation of additional laws and regulations is also funded by taxpayers. This report makes a conclusion that there are better ways of handling sex offenders, rather than subjecting them and their families to excessive punishment, humiliation and harm, and violating their rights. The main aim of the justice system is reforming offenders and giving them a chance to live normal lives. The use of the public sex offender registry fails to do this.